|

CLICK
HERE TO SUBSCRIBE NOW!
Why I Like The Living Resources Newsletter
by Tomm Arntsen, A Living Resources Newsletter
reader
I am a mathematician, not a psychologist.
But since my mind governs the actions of my body, I find it wise
to know a little about how my mind operates. What I think/feel
about an issue determines what I do in relation to it. Every day
I need to analyze my current situation, be objective, face the
facts, think long-range, and make the right choices.
To do this, I need to be guided by reality-oriented, life-based
values and principles. The philosophy of Objectivism (Ayn Rand’s
philosophy) is my basic view of life; my frame of reference.
But I have found philosophy to be too abstract, too general,
for most practical purposes. More concrete advice is needed. Therefore
I am very glad that there are some professionals out there who
have taken the time to figure out the relationship between how
to think and how to live a good life. However, there are not many
really good therapists out there (judging from their advice!)
Of the ones I know. . ., you are definitively the best!
Though we can’t all be psychologists, I think we all need to
know a little something about how our minds work, and about the
relationship between thought-feeling-action. We all need to be
our own mini-psychologists just to keep ourselves sane and well.
You help us do that. You do an important job, and you do it well.
For this, I thank you.
From another satisfied
reader:
I've been a subscriber to your Newsletter for some years now,
and it is always good. The most recent Newsletter is full
of excellent insights and identifications and making certain confusions
of the day very explicit. I whispered an awed "Bravo!"
after reading it. Not just one article -- all of them --
were outstanding. The choice-compulsion-responsibility issue in
"Priests;" the misplacement of responsibility and guilt
in "The Psychology of Guilt;" the social-metaphysicianism
of narcissism vs. true self-esteem, and reason vs. instinct relating
to an independence-dependence schism in "Running on Instinct"
were all marvelous -- and all related. All pointed to reason
and responsibility vs. irrationality and irresponsibility.
Thank you for such a magnificent job!
Click
here to subscribe now!
|